Gripes against Porter and the lackeys.

This is a rather hasty collage of drafts made at the time.

Dear Mr Porter, Ministers, Members of Parliament, Senators,

On or about the 19^th December last year (2016) I sent you an email submission regarding some matters of governmental financial policy and the justice system. I have not received any reply to either explain the obvious deficiencies or to indicate that any attempt will be made to rectify such deficiencies.

Clearly, the matters raised imply some serious questions regarding the nature and purpose of government and the legal and moral justifications for some of the government's, and its instruments', actions.

In the interest of improving the cooperation of “Elected Representatives” with the commonwealth of the Nation's people I would ask you to provide answers to the following:

1. Was the submission too long?

2. Were there too many polysyllabic words used?

3. Do you choose to ignore it because it's “beyond your pay grade” or you might get yourself into “hot water” by even acknowledging the matters raised?

4. Were you advised by your Party to ignore it because it might be a “contentious issue” with potential to embarrass the Party?

5. Were you advised by entrenched “Public Servants” to ignore it because it might be a “contentious issue” with potential to embarrass the Government?

6. Are you ideologically committed to the subversion of the Australian Nation in favour of some supranational oligarchy?

That O'Connell has recently been released from jail in New Zealand and has returned to asylum in Malaysia does not exonerate the persecutors that wrongly accused him; or the faulty “system” that prosecuted and “convicted” him of a “crime” that does not exist as any kind of violation of the civil order that should promote and protect ordinary people going about their ordinary business. That there are numerous constitutionally illegal statutes protecting and empowering alien minorities to the detriment of the commonwealth should be a matter of serious concern.

It goes without saying that the “justice” system is in need of serious overhaul and renovation to return it to the Constitutional protection of the many from the depredations of privileged minorities.

Please find following a representation of the original for your recapitulation.

Eagerly awaiting your reply.

Yours sincerely,

David M. Marwick

P.O. Box 249 York 6302

Dear recipient,

Please find following a copy of a submission made to Christian Porter, the Member for Pearce in the Parliament of Australia. This submission is forwarded to you in the hope that the issues will become widely known and that you might bring some pressure to bear on the relevant “authorities” to have the matters resolved in a manner that protects National Sovereignty and the integrity of “the rule of law”.

An open letter to:

Christian Porter, the Member for Pearce in the Parliament of Australia, and the Federal Government Minister for Social Services.

Dear Mr Porter,

As Member of Parliament supposed to represent the electorate of Pearce in Western Australia I propose some matters for your immediate consideration.

It has come to my attention that the Federal Government is intending to "legalise" and extend the powers of many financial "industries" to pillage the Nation and its citizens by granting such institutions a virtual autonomy to protect themselves at the expense of the good of the community by a tool, sanctioned by the Government and controlled by themselves, known as the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

I refer particularly to the unassailable financial predators known as banks. Those institutions that create the "medium of exchange" (money) as an interest-bearing debt to the community. Not only do they pillage every community with debt but they speculate with fantastic, unreal prognostications of what something might be "worth" in some vague future. That is the guts of "derivatives" and "futures" "markets".

Now then, Mr Porter, it should be apparent to any moderately knowledgeable and rational man that to allow some alien (supranational) elites autonomous ownership and control of the Nation's financial policy is to deliver the country's human and natural resources to them... that is, to allow a foreign interest to determine what funding is available to whom and for what.

It is also apparently likely that recent opposition to the APRA subversion has provoked a "damage control" proposition to call a "Royal Commission".

A "Royal Commission" into banking is guaranteed to hand down "findings" entirely convenient to whomever picked the "investigators" and their "handlers"... of no use at all to the sovereignty and prosperity of the Nation.

What is needed, of course, is a banking system entirely independent of supranational manipulators that can create the necessary exchange medium (money) according to the needs of the economy and to facilitate the real productive potential of which the Nation and its people are capable. It must be completely detached from the speculative and usurious predations of "merchant" banking. There are striking precedents that confirm that such separations of speculative adventures of “banks” and pragmatic money management banking really "work" to the advantage of the Nation and its people.

It is incomprehensible that a real Australian could acquiesce to the Globalist assault on the Nation without being ideologically committed to the idea that all people are the property of the "State" and their purpose is to serve the State. That used to be called Communism. Whether the “ownership” of the State occurs by violent “revolution” or the subtle incursions of unbridled “Capitalism” the result is exactly the same...

As I see it the only explanations for such a betrayal of the Nation are blind megalomaniac ambition and greed and/or an ideological commitment to a perverse notion of the nature and purpose of human society and/or a blind adherence to occult esoterica by some secretive coercion, bribery or blackmail.

Now, while I have your attention, I will recall, for you, that you were Attorney General of Western Australia when Brendon O'Connell was spuriously charged and convicted of a "no crime" and sent to prison to be tortured and beaten. While I acknowledge that O'Connell is a rather disagreeable egotist; that is not a crime.

As Attorney General you were the official representative of "The Crown" that, apparently, oversaw the prosecution and "trial" that was a blatant miscarriage of justice; both justice according to the law of the land and Natural Justice that prohibits anyone from being criminalised for a non-crime based on immoral and coercive injunctions and spurious testimonies that are irrelevant.

That you allowed foreign nationals and other uninvolved parties to influence the Court requires an in-depth explanation.

O'Connell has obsessively documented his case and it can be found on the internet.

Yours sincerely,

David M. Marwick

(Since this was penned Mr Porter has been appointed Federal Attorney General)

(With the surreptitious censorship of internet searches O'Connell's case files are buried in a plethora of spurious detractions. The files can be found here:

https://isolatebutpreserve.blogspot.my/2017/02/brendon-oconnells-legal-documents.html?m=1 ).

My most recent attempts to access these documents has failed. The source has been removed or is otherwise unavailable.

Your patriotic duty

An open letter to Mr Christian Porter, Federal member for the electorate of Pearce, Western Australia, and Federal Attorney General.

Dear Mr Porter,

I have noted that you have ignored my previous missives. You obviously have my email address on your file as I have recently received a couple of puerile publicity platitudes from your office... one of which asked me what I thought about the ANZAC "spirit". I replied asking YOU what the ANZAC "spirit" meant to you, which is particularly important because while I'm a nobody from the bush you are a "gentleman" of prestige and influence.

Further to what I said earlier, the presently running Royal Commission must address the issue of predatory usury and speculation as it effects the exploitation of the Nation by entangling it and its citizens in inescapable, and increasing, debt. First up, the speculative adventures of "merchant" or "investment" entrepreneurs connected to "banks" must be completely detached and isolated from the real business of loans and deposits whereby a bank is a custodian of deposits and an issuer and guarantor of loans.

All that is pretty simple...

But... I suspect that you do not attain a position of "influence" other than by pledging allegiance to occult (secretive) powers that can protect you and "reward" you in the pursuit of their goals that do not include the well-being, the National and cultural security of Australia and Australians.

It has always taken a great deal of deceptive (if not outright false) publicity from a compliant media to sell bipartisan treachery to a largely unsuspecting public, but media credibility is diminishing along with that of politicians.

It has recently come to my attention that Bob Katter is intending to introduce a Bill that requires legitimate banking to be separated from the speculators. If you are a representative of the Australian people you must second and support Bob's submission. If you are a sycophantic lackey of the supranational secretocracy you will do what you have always done.

David Marwick

Another open letter to Christian Porter, Federal member for Pearce in Western Australia and Federal Attorney General.

It will be sent also to other prominent Members of Parliament, Western Australian Senators, and others who may be implicated, concerned or interested.

Dear Mr Porter,

You have shown a distinct disdain for the national security and cultural identity of the people of this country by favouring foreign interests against the natural rights of a people to pursue their prosperity and cultural advantages.

As Attorney General of WA you oversaw miscarriages of justice of both the natural and civil kind. One can only suspect that you are a lackey of a system or protocol that is not rooted in natural justice, at least. I could give an example but you have already indicated your duplicity by not addressing my previous missive that alluded to one glaringly obvious case replete with damning evidence.

As is usual for miscreants serving a foreign agenda they trumpet, with shallow rhetoric, the parsimonious distribution of a few lollies while their real business is carried out in the shadows.

Now, you should indicate, at least, a vestigial patriotism by opposing the supranational banks' extortionate ownership and control of the Australian economy. "Normal banking protocol" these days is a mission of rape and pillage via fantastic speculation in the derivatives and other non-productive loans "markets" liberally enhanced by outright fraud as minimally shown by the recent "Royal Commission". Financial speculators have no reasonable claim to the financial reserves or the practical usefulness of any enterprise or property.

I don't imagine that you would ever countenance an almost certainly politically lethal public denunciation of the ideology that you seem to support but could you, at least once, just side with ordinary Australians against the perverse secretocracy and support a separation of extortionate speculation from "normal" custodial banking and propose an independent National Bank to serve the Nation not the predators?

Yours sincerely,

David Marwick

Addendum.

We all instinctively or intuitively know (or, at least, suspect) that "career politicians" are "preselected" to be opportunists who can be relied on to support an agenda that they may, or may not, know. The role of the Senate is to be a "house of review" where Senators are directly appointed by the people to "keep an eye on" and check the megalomaniac ambitions of the legislators.

However, the Senate is completely useless if it is also stacked with Party Hacks who never do any homework and/or wouldn't dare to buck the system.

I have the utmost revulsion for the Senate bludgers. Mostly cowards and bludgers (with few exceptions) who were supposedly elected to review and challenge the proposals of the Party lackeys of the "Lower House". A bunch of prestigious salary bludgers who hardly ever show up to hear, let alone consider, a Maiden Speech or a dissertation against "proposed legislation" or even to vote unless to do so as directed along Party lines. Stupid lackeys! who think they're employed by the Commonwealth to "rubber stamp" Party politics.

Senators should be docked pay for not showing up for work and their constituents should be regularly informed of matters being considered, thus to expose the blardy ineptitude of the incumbent and expose him to the wrath of the electorate rather than the almost universally treasonous media.

Proper, dinkum, bludgers! Fraudulently claiming an inordinate "salary" for being idiot lackeys of a Party politics that is engineered by an hostile foreign influence.

There is, presently, a Senate Inquiry and a Bill proposed in the Senate to do with banking practice. Senators! get to work!

David Marwick

Post script.

Most of these gripes have been sent via email to relevant Members, Ministers, Attorneys General, Party leaders, Senators, (State and Federal) (about 30 names all up). To begin with I received a few computer generated acknowledgements but no real replies apart from one of Porter's secretaries assuring me (after I had repeatedly sent the original missive to all of Porter's known email addresses, local office and Federal) that he would ensure that the matter would be brought to Porter's attention. End of responses.

After that it seems that some censorship agency created an algorithm that diverted all such gripes away from the intended recipients to somewhere unknown. The censorship continues and it is not limited to the politicians... it seems that some clandestine agency working within the Telstra server diverts these “inconvenient” or “unacceptable” complaints against the stooges and lackeys of hostile secretocracies and foreign corporations; perhaps to the “Technion” in Israel since they continually boast about having all the IT cleverdicks in the World.

Post post script.

O'Connell is a bit hard to track down from time to time as he is serially banned and deleted from various media platforms. Some years ago I did download and read his legal documents but I don't know where it is now. It's over a thousand pages as I recall. Anyhow, here's a much more recent brief summary by a much less volatile O'Connell, of some of his trials. It is pertinent as the greasy Porter was WA A.G. at the time of this persecution.

42. INTERVIEW WITH LEBANESE TV - ISRAEL & CYBER PANDEMIC FEB 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNxch41Orzk