Racism is a thing - it is not just an invention of the woke left
I am going to say two things here which are perhaps unpopular, although it really is just common sense and ought to be utterly unremarkable.
Controversial statement 1:
racism exists
This may come as a shock to many "alt-right" folk, who have decided that racism is a completely false narrative and is simply a weapon used by the "woke left" to demonise conservatives. It is unfortunate that so many people these days do so little thinking and reflection. It is a sign of the decay of language and cvilisation when nonsensical, illogical beliefs are upheld by people who assert that they are smarter and more aware than others.
Just like allegations of rape and domestic abuse, allegations of racism have often been used as a political weapon, and it seems to be a tactic more common on the left than the right - this I acknowledge.
However, to miminise or excuse racism when it actually occurs is as despicable as doing the same for rape or pedophilia.
I do not conform to any political stereotypes and eschew labels left and right, conservative and progressive. They are at best vague indicators of a person's integrity and values, and at worst they become simply a cloak to allow shysters and con-artists to manipulate public opinion. This happens because people are so easily controlled through the process of group/tribe identification. All you have to do is establish a label that summarises a bunch of ideas which are valid and meaningful for a significant proportion of society. You build loyalty around that label, and use the label to define your critique of people who are outside that group (defined by a different label). You then force people to choose between labels, and human nature will cause the people whose minds have been pre-conditioned to always side with their label, even when their label is being used to justify something utterly wrong.
We see that these days in the nonsense of mask wearing for example. Wearing a mask has become a form of virtue signalling for the left, and has nothing whatsoever to do with science, facts or reason. If you belong to the left (ie. if you identify with the label) you are psychologically compelled to go along with mask mandates even if secretly in your private moments you think it's a bit silly.
The same mechanism occurs in right-wing groups. For example, right-wingers are pressured to agree with capital punishment even though it contradicts the idea that life is sacred, which informs their position on abortion. The failure of logic bothers them less than "crossing party lines" would, if they took a principled position against state sanctioned murder.
The issue of racism seems to be one which has now been taken over and swallowed by identity politics to such a degree that we can't even have a sensible conversation about it any more. The fact that accusations of racism have become the dominant method of political brawling used by the left has led the self-labelled right to become numb and incapable of recognising that the word is a meaningful construct, and yes, it does denote realities in this world which are rather unpleasant. This is of course a terrible and counter productive way of addressing the situation because it means that the right can't even see that in many cases racism is being perpetrated by the left themselves. Organisations like BLM are actually racist, but conservatives are prohibited from calling this out because they are so busy defending themselves against the same accusations that they are afraid to call a spade a spade.
And there is no topic which highlights this more clearly than the question of racism and the British royal family. Conservatives are terrified of this whole topic, and run screaming from it with inane quips about "woke politics", when the evidence of deep, inveterate racism from this corrupt, rotten bloodline of murderous oligarchs is staring them in the face. Prince Phillip was a Nazi. Harry's mother was the victim of a hit (this is proven) and died after having written letters predicting the exact manner of her death at the hands of this family, and after having become the enemy of her inlaws by forming a liason with dark skinned gentleman to whom she may have been pregnant. Harry married a mixed race girl who has now gone on record with the Queen of talk shows Oprah (a very smart move) to document the racist attitudes and intimidating behaviour of this family, who controlled her like a prisoner and drove her to contemplate suicide. All this is eerily reminiscent of statements made by the late Princess of Wales shortly before her untimely demise.
The British Royals think in terms of purity of bloodlines - and it is no joke for them. It is however, abhorrent to most normal, civilised, educated people to think that some people elevate DNA above the quality of a person's character, an attitude which exactly summarises and represents racism.
Controversial statement 2:
The royals are racists.
Are you angry yet?
Uploaded 1 month ago . . .
Not directly relevant to the issue of racism, but throws some light on Harry's disaffection with the UK Royal Family into which he was born through no fault of his own.
https://youtu.be/DwhJgOsf02I?si=eR7zentU70sig7I_
At 40, Prince Harry FINALLY Admits What We All Suspected
Prince Harry is a member of the British royal family and the younger son of Prince Charles and Princess Diana. Known for his charitable work, adventurous spirit, and candid personality, Harry has long been a public figure. From his early years in the spotlight, Harry was often seen as the more rebellious royal, frequently making headlines for his adventurous and sometimes controversial actions. Despite the challenges of growing up in the royal family, Harry found purpose in his military career, serving in the British Army and undertaking two tours in Afghanistan. After retiring from military service, he focused on charity work, co-founding the Invictus Games, a sporting event for wounded veterans. Recently, Prince Harry had a shocking revelation.
The Surprised
There's a whole extra discussion on this :)
The Truth of It | Harry, Meghan & Oprah | Canadian Pastor Jailed Over COVID | Banning Books | Ep. 64
I previously stated on this platform that I thought Martyn Iles was brilliant. I now need to revise that assessment. His analysis of the Harry & Meghan Oprah interview is shallow and trite, leans heavily on dogma and lacks insight. It seems like another example of right wing group think that is mire…
Fifth Estate PressIf that's true it explains everything.
William will be the next king. harry is a bastard... not giving him titles is as close to an admission of his illegitimacy as you will get from that family.
One other thing to mention, Leni, is that the Queen had the ability to give Harry his Princely title. The rules are not set in stone. She declined to do this despite granting titles to all of William's kids.
Don't get me wrong. I don't deeply care about this, but I just call a spade a spade when I see it.
The main reason I'm even interested in this us because Harry's mother was by all accounts a decent human being and was tormented and probably terminated by these ghouls.
Diana was a celeb, she was privileged, but she was a human being who deserved basic respect.
When high profile people are assassinated with such ease, what does that say about us, about our status and our rights?
It suggests that we are about equivalent to bacteria in their eyes.
Regardless of the throne of England being occupied by a bunch of usurper German serpents.. He married a self important, B-grade actress, slapper. she will rip through his 25 million inheritance and move on.... only to find out that other than 15 min of "i banged a princess" fame (for the banger, not the bangee) she will be yesterdays news. There will be some attempts as a spokes womaX for BLM but someone will inevitably call her a white arsed, privileged, virtue signaling nobody and she will then fade into irrelevance on a park bench somewhere taking it in turn at crying with Alyssa Milano. i could be wrong... i couldn't care less :)
The lying rright wing media is blowing this up to be all about racism and woke politics but that is a distortion. It is far more about the despotic antics of a degenerate aristocracy.
I don't understand the vicious hatred and vitriol that is directed towards these people from right wingers. Check the comments on Fox or Rebel News on Youtube. It is, in my opinion an indication that the right is every bit as brainwashed and irrational as the left, and equally lacking in compassion and basic humanity.
I watched that interview with an open mind, and formed my own opinion. My opinion is that it was genuine. I may be wrong, but my position on this is based on the core respect I have for these people as human beings, which is sadly missing in brainwashed right-wingers.
Ordinarily when I hear celebrities say things I can't care any less.
This interview however has potential (there's that wonderful word) to change entire countries with the way the media is eating it up and politics is reacting.
This is why I'm interested in it.
Show comments 11–13
Having now watched the interview, I'm unfortunately uncertain of what to think.
In the back of my mind, I'm suspicious about there being a grander agenda at play. Prince Charles for example and his advocating of 'A Great Reset'. The Queen and her POSSIBLY innocent, but doesn't come across as innocent speech about taking children away from their families (for the greater good to fight Covid of course).
Meghan is an actor. And I'm not saying I don't trust actors period. But it is/was her job to be convincing.
The various segments taken at their home, filmed within the chicken pen - this could not have been done by sheer coincidence. The goal of filming all of those questions in the chicken pen would likely have been to encourage the viewer to feel like they relate to these 'down to Earth' people more. If there is a goal of making them seem more relatable / more convincing, does that mean the truth (which Meghan mentions time and time again that she thinks is of upmost importance) is not enough? Or does it mean, the truth is not being shared?
The two of them do come across quite convincing though. Although my wife pointed out a few apparent flaws which I haven't verified specifically.
E.g.'s:
- Meghan claims upon arriving at the palace, she has to hand over her keys, etc and is not allowed to drive. Yet apparently Kate has been spotted driving.
- The story about Archer not being given the title of prince has been explained due to his position in the lineage. Apparently (again, none of this I have verified but it is at least plausible) after the 7th in the line for the throne, the title is no longer given. Why 7th? I don't know. Technically if this is true, then once the Queen dies, Archer would become 7th in line and at that point be declared a Prince. I mean, it makes sense, there needs to be a stop somewhere. Who, after all is in line for the throne if the Queen and Charles and Philip and Andrew (I don't actually know where Philip and Andrews positions are) and William and his three children and Harry and Harry's children all died in a freak plane crash? Whomever that individual is that would take the reigns, are they currently titled Prince or Princess?
- When Meghan said the colour of the babies skin was discussed, she gave the impression the conversation happened after she was pregnant, yet when Harry was prompted the question, he gave the impression it happened much earlier, in terms of a future thought/question "if they were to have children".
In the instance, everything they have said is innocent and honest (and their stories are just slightly skewed because that's what happens with all of us when we recount things), it's still interesting the way it's being portrayed in Australia (a push for a Communist Republic) and in the U.S. (more support for the racial justice warriors dominating the narrative and indoctrination of Americans). It also appears to be a very successful divide and conquer strategy yet again, creating a division between England and America, as though the two countries are in some kind of battle now.
Sounds like a Great Reset might be needed...
Regardless, I do believe there is plenty of truth within the talk relating to "The Firm" vs "The Family". From early in the interview I was waiting for Harry to say that his family are stuck in this corrupt system and he's broken away to rescue them, then towards the end, he more or less did say something along those lines. I.e. The Shadow Government Corporation has taken over and the Royal Family are nothing more than prisoners, part of a PR campaign.
This I believe to be true, however I don't believe all members of the Family are innocent. I suspect at some point they were sold out. Could it go back as far as somewhere between Edward the 7th and George the 6th? Or is it only in recent decades that the selling out took place?
We are all the human race, so racism would entail hating all of the human race.
But using the word racism to describe altered feelings towards someone with a different coloured skin, we can say racism does exist. I prefer to say prejudice does exist. Of course it does! It's a natural survival mechanism.
I've been on trains (public transport) hundreds of times over my life. During this time, I've had two unpleasant encounters:
1 - involving a friend of mine (when we were young boys, not even in double digit age yet) where it was demanded that he get off the seat so the other individual could sit. There was no specific reasoning for this, as in no elderly or disabled or carrying a child scenario, it was just literally the other individual wanted the seat and that was it. When my friend declined, he got punched in the nose, giving him a blood nose. The perpetrator was aboriginal.
2 - Heading to the Royal show with my cousin (I think he was 17 at the time) and a couple of friends (we were 19 and 20), we were approached by a couple of aboriginals around our age. They were threatening to assault my younger (and smaller) cousin, holding a fist up to him unless we gave them money. We were standing our ground but eventually my friend took some cash out. The perpetrator attempted to steal his whole wallet, while the rest of his family were nearby blocking the exit door but allowing the perpetrator to get off. He didn't get away with the wallet but he did get away with a small amount of cash.
Can I be blamed for developing an un-trusting prejudice given 100% of bad experiences involved an aboroginal.
To be fair though, when I see an aboriginal, I don't automatically judge. The truth is, I don't judge based on skin colour. I judge based on mannerisms. Pieces of shit like this have a certain way about them; the way they talk in general, the way they talk to each other, they way they move, the way they dress. Skin colour is of no relevance, however it seems a larger portion (in Western Australia at least) of aboriginals seems to have these same characteristics. But when I owned a supplement store, I was able to identify so called white people who had similar characteristics and in turn attempted theft as well.
So I still hold firm that racism does not exist in the way it is presented to us.
However, I accept the notion that some people do have prejudice/racism PURELY based on skin colour. These individuals are either misinformed or they have a mental disability which makes them believe in some way they are superior to the rest of us (as is the case with the blood line style royal family).
What would serve as the best approach to fix this situation is for people exposing such racism (such as Meghan and Harry) to be very specific in explaining the difference between the racism they experience and the "racism" being portrayed in social politics. They ARE two entirely different things, so they should not be classified under the same name. A little bit like Covid and Influenza.
I think you guys were on the receiving end of racist hate crimes. Many Aborigines are racist - sometimes against white people, sometimes against brown skinned people who they also resent. White Australians are probably the least racist people overall although there are stand out exceptions. But there is definitely systemic racism in Aboriginal communities.
Of course the official "woke" position that dark skinned people cannot be racist is wrong and deeply offensive - and essentially racist. LOL
And with that, I have also always advocated that it's the system which breeds and encourages the criminals / lowlifes, etc. Not the "systemic racism" system, but the wealth redistribution system which creates poverty, which in turn leads to crime.
And this all is a difficult prospect because it's a fine line between accepting personal responsibility and blaming the system. This is where I feel something I heard Bruce Lipton say once rings very true, to paraphrase "you are 100% responsible for your own actions, ONCE you become aware/informed about how and why you are 100% responsible for your own actions".
I have one question though... as wearing a mask floats gently down and lands on the the razor of left and right, the left in Texas are screaming that "ITS SCIENCE" (all 50 of them). They would talk about statistics as they appeal to authority to force you to wear three masks and get your genocide shot of love (even though the statistics and studies carried out by the same people they quote say the opposite). You cant go against statistics though right? So the authorities also say that the African American population is 13% of the population but carries out over 50% of the crime (a lot of it very, very violent with the victim chosen from racial groups that they know will not fight back. And usually with racial slurs aplenty). One would by the scientific method think that both policy enforcement and a healthy minded, scientifically driven, educated member of the public understands that statistically a threat to life, rape or loss of property is most likely going to happen by (Da Daaaaaa) the people most predisposed to carry out such acts. But this scientific reasoning would not only be classed as racist, the calls for your arrest for this appeal to authority would be considered just terms for your loss of income, possibly your house being burned down and increasingly a just cause for your murder. Case and point... the house leader Vodka Pelosi just had a Zoom call with many prominent Asian Americans. They were decrying the racial attacks on Asian Americans and used no visual aids.. because the listener is supposed to think its lag from Trump calling Faici's bio weapon the china flu. Meanwhile, in almost every case caught on camera and purloined from news stories and added to montages, the perpetrators are almost 100% African American.... If you can manage to find someone from the left to ask why science and appeals to authority only work for them without them frothing at the mouth and starting to throw their own feces, they will tell you that all minority crime is justified because of systemic racism. And yet the Democrats not only run the very cities this all happens in, they have done for decades. In the end all of this i believe is causing racism... And i believe that that is the intent. A last desperate play put on by those that rule the world to stave of the inevitable collapse... A collapse that is on their shoulders because they wanted it all and treated their own species as children, cattle and cannon fodder.
There has been an intensive political program of inciting racial hostility led by groups like BLM and antifa and silently accepted by the entire establishment left. It looks like a provocation, and smells like a provocation. As you say they are trying to incite racial conflict. It suits their ends. It is a divide and conquer strategy.