
The death of Mussolini
Moral of the story: things don't always end well for fascist thugs.
Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.
- Benito Mussonlini
The death of Benito Mussolini, the deposed Italian fascist dictator, occurred on 28 April 1945, in the final days of World War II in Europe, when he was summarily executed by an Italian partisan in the small village of Giulino di Mezzegra in northern Italy.
In 1940, Mussolini took his country into World War II on the side of Nazi Germany but soon was met with military failure. By the autumn of 1943, he was reduced to being the leader of a German puppet state in northern and central Italy and was faced with the Allied advance from the south and an increasingly violent internal conflict with the partisans. In April 1945, with the Allies breaking through the last German defences in northern Italy and a general uprising of the partisans taking hold in the cities, Mussolini's situation became untenable. On 25 April he fled Milan, where he had been based, and tried to escape to the Swiss border. He and his mistress, Claretta Petacci, were captured on 27 April by local partisans near the village of Dongo on Lake Como. Mussolini and Petacci were executed the following afternoon, two days before Adolf Hitler's suicide.
The corpse of Mussolini (second from left) next to Petacci (middle) and other executed fascists in Piazzale Loreto, Milan, 1945
The bodies of Mussolini and Petacci were taken to Milan and left in a suburban square, the Piazzale Loreto, for a large angry crowd to insult and physically abuse. They were then hung upside down from a metal girder above a service station on the square. The bodies were beaten, shot at, and hit with hammers. Initially, Mussolini was buried in an unmarked grave but, in 1946, his body was dug up and stolen by fascist supporters. Four months later it was recovered by the authorities who then kept it hidden for the next eleven years. Eventually, in 1957, his remains were allowed to be interred in the Mussolini family crypt in his home town of Predappio (Emilia-Romagna). His tomb has become a place of pilgrimage for neo-fascists and the anniversary of his death is marked by neo-fascist rallies.
Why is this gruesome freak show a permanent header for a supposed "Citizen Journalist's" discussion forum? Is Winston Smith become a salesman for Big Brother's "Ministry of Truth" flogging fear of a remote "enemy" and a proposed simplistic "solution"?
Any subscriber can post a story. This is not a "permanent header".
The purpose of the post was to provide a reminder that tyrants often come to bad ends. I think that is very relevant to today's world.
You seem like an angry person, which is understandable, but your anger is being misdirected.
If you have nothing to say other than to try to start a fight with your first post on this platform then you're not particularly welcome here. I suggest you go somewhere else to insult people.
Bugga! Another joint that "enter" does not shift to a new line but finishes and posts the comment. Some of us old blokes are baffled by typewriter inconsistencies. I will contend that the likes of Fascism, Naziism, Communism and many more socio-political "isms" are but shades of the explosion of arcane and esoteric "illuminations" peddled by all sorts of competing cultists of the 19th and 20th centuries. Just about everyone who thought themselves "enlightened and aloof" from the grubby, ordinary people because of the "insights" gained in the dingy rooms of spiritualism, theosophy, oriental studies, primordial "Traditional" wisdom etc. etc. that morphed into the all encompassing "New Ageism" of the mid C20 imbibed the diabolically narcissistic idea that they should run the show to save the World from the scourge of despicable humans. Anyhow, I'll get into a more particular criticism of the likes of Mme Blavatsky, Rene Guenon, Ananda Coomeraswamy, and many others if there is any interest or opposition.
Orrite, Winston, I have no tolerance or respect for blardy snowflakes who cannot bear to be challenged outside of their comfort zone. I'll have another go at posting another "story" and see what happens.
Sounds interesting. I'm familiar with those names. I don't think those writers had any influence on the current zeitgeist, which is informed by Marxist critical theory. The writers you mentioned were not peddlers of identity politics.
Agreed, Madame Blavatsky was some form of scammer, however. The others were pretty solid, and you forgot to mention Aldous Huxley who popularised the idea of a "great tradition" which embraces many religions.
Show 3 more replies
As far as I can see Aldous and his other famous family members were but cunning propagandists for the underlying esoterica. It's a long time since I chased this nonsense and its proponents but I think it was Rene Guenon that coined the term "Traditionalism" to give some status to his esoterica and it was the associate of Aleister Crowley, Ananda Coomeraswamy who coined the term "Sophia Perennis" to sell the notion that some kind of perennial wisdom could be accessed by any kind of arcane rituals and incantations. Although Blavatsky and Guenon were selling much the same stuff Guenon was pissed off because Blavatsky seems to have cornered the influential (global English) market with her brand name and distribution network. How about you tell me how to negotiate and work this blardy 'site so I can disturb the fat pigeons' complacent moaning.
I was wanting to submit another "story" but I can't find any opportunity or means to do so. Am I already banned?
That's because you're not a subscriber.
I guess love could in fact be empathy, for fear comes out of uncertainty, which involves not knowing or being ignorant to the facts, including the facts of another individuals circumstances/thought patterns.
And yes, I've always said if I didn't have a family I'd either be dead or in jail by now.
That's only because he's facing resistance in the face of Victoria being used as the example where tests are conducted in higher volume and likely with higher amplifications. Plus the police are not Commonwealth police, they are the Strong Cities police, so it's easier to use Victoria in this way.
If Mark McGowan was facing the same kind of resistance, his true colours would be seen and possibly put Andrews to shame.
Listening to The Good Sauces recent 'Not Q&A' chat they said something which is resonating with me a lot (finally). The opposite of fear is not courage. The opposite of fear is love.
They also compared the situation we are in to diets. Eating toxic food gets your body and mind in a terrible state over years, not overnight. So a fad diet cannot fix years of destruction overnight. Similarly, the situation our culture is in has gotten here over 50 years or more. It can't be fixed with an single election campaign. It is and needs to be a slow battle to be properly rectified, even if some of us know exactly what is wrong.
The reason this resonates with me, I've been struggling with (as I kind of asked in a question in a post I did in a roundabout sort of way), knowing how far to extend my empathy. There is so much shit in the world, especially at the political level and I want to fix it all but in doing so, I am unintentionally harming the relationship I have with my immediate family. So how far do you extend your help and love without it becoming detrimental?
The conclusion seems to be that you let your love and offer of help be known but you need victims to come to your safehaven. And victims will be more likely to do that when safehavens become more of a norm as it can be a big risk for a victim to leave an abusive situation to go somewhere they are not confident in.
So how do we make safehavens the norm? We must focus internally and set a good example for others to hopefully follow. Set a 'contagious' example of love, empathy and honesty.
Referring back to the years and years of damage can't be fixed overnight; David Wolfe once said when you're sailing a ship from point A to point B, the further the distance you travel, the further away from (or towards) your desired destination you will end up with only 1 degree change of course. Let's face it, a sailing ship cannot do a 180 degree turn in an instant. And I relate this to human perspective as well. When we have our eyes locked on one space, our head cannot be turned 180 degrees in an instant or else our neck is snapped. The head/eyes need to be ever so gently guided towards a different destination/view for any form of success.
These thoughts are what made me think of a Jimi Hendrix quote in my recent video:
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace".
It was Dan Andrews who sparked this post. Of all the Australian petty dictators he is proabably the most blatant authoritarian/corporatist/fascist.
According to various accounts of the fate of Mussolini's corpse, one woman fired five pistol shots into his head in retaliation for the same number of her dead sons, all slain in the facist government's imperialistic wars since 1935, shouting, “Five shots for my five assassinated sons!”; when he was cut down from the gas station roof girders, upon striking the ground, his skull cracked open, releasing some brain matter, and one of his eyes fell out of its socket.
What actions did Mussolini take to be labelled a Fascist?
Haha - your joking right? He invented the term "fascist". It was his brand. The word was used proudly by his followers until the end of the war.
Here is a famous quote by Mussonlini which exposes that he was one of the first globalists.
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."

Quote of the day: Benito Mussolini on corporatism
“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”
The Roanoke TimesWhatever he did, pales in comparison to what our corporate rulers do to us.
I genuinely have never looked at the history of Mussolini.
But what I was hoping to get at, was a history lesson showcasing precisely what Fascism is. And then show it to the general public and see if they can recognise any similarities between Mussolini and what their "leaders" are doing and at the same time ask them to point out which policies Trump was focused on which make him a Fascist, by very historical definition of the word.
Well Mussolini is very interesting, and worth looking into. He saw himself as reinventing an ancient model of society along the lines of the Roman Empire. Hitler was fascinated by this, and created his own version of that, with reference to Germanic folk history. Hitler was inspired by Mussolini, but his reinvented civilisation was more efficient than that of "Il Duce" possibly due to the more motivated and efficient nature of German society.
This was a period in history when many intellectuals were obsessed with rediscovering the cultural roots of modern societies, and there was a belief among many that European societies ought to return to their "true nature". This went along with racialist ideologies which were tied to the Eugenics movement which was very popular all over the western world, including the United States.
The Fascists in Italy did not take all this to it's logical extreme as they did in Germany. They were pretty soft on jews right up till 1944 when the Germans more or less took over.
The famous quote about Mussolini is that he "made the trains run on time". He was a law and order guy who helped the oligarchy retain power and fend off the Communists - playing a similar to role to Hitler. Franco in Spain also jumped on the band wagon and invented his own form of Spanish Fascism.
In retrospect we tend to think that fascists were always seen as the enemies of the West, but it isn't so. Hitler was extremely popular all over the world. He hosted the Olympic games in 1936. He was on the cover of Time Magazine. Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy looked like economic miracles.
But all the while, behind the scenes, these regimes were ruthlessly eliminating their opponents. They murdered anyone who posed a serious threat, and imprisoned thousands who did not go along with their absolutist political ideologies.
The Russians under Stalin were doing the same thing, and it all came to a head in Spain where the Loyalists, supported by Stalin, went to war with the Fascists supported by Hitler and Mussolini.
I recommend reading Hemingway's "For Whom the Bell Tolls" - it's an amazing exposition which coldly analyses the complete moral failure of both sides in that conflict.
Show 1 more replies
Back then, were these people extremely popular because there was no communication hub (like the Internet) to allow opposers to unite and spread the truth?
Without the internet, would we not have a situation where everybody believed that the Joe Bidens and Jacinda Aderns of the world are nothing but extremely popular and "making the trains run on time".