What is the meaning of these bizarre revelations about Scott Morrison?
There is something very weird about the revelation that the Ausssie PM, Scott Morrison, secretly swore himself into 5 ministerial posts during 2020.
For details about this odd scandal, please watch the video posted at the top of this story. I suggest you watch it before reading my reflections below.
This is clearly not just a case of hubris and ego at work - we are used to that in politics, but this looks like something that was decided on, under pressure, as an emergency action. It suggests to me that Morrison was receiveing guidance from somewhere that something catastrophic was about to happen.
As we know, the catastrophe never happened, despite the media created hysteria. Covid was not even a blip in the death statistics for Australia in 2020. It was a media event which preciptated the imposition of totalitarian regime which lasted for about 2 years, but there was no catastrophe in terms of lives lost.
This is very perplexing for several reasons. Firstly, there was no publicly available data at the time which suggested that some kind of genocidal plague was sweeping the earth. The disease known as covid-19 was from the beginning clearly not a threat to young, healthy people. There never was any data to support the fears that this virus was an existential threat. There was just media hype and fake modelling.
Morrison's actions suggest that he was getting intel that there was something much worse on the way, and the only hypothesis I can come up with is that he believed that this was biological warfare, and that Australia needed to prepare to go on a war footing. This of course dovetails with many other small shreds of information which have been reavealed about the Wuhan lab and what they may have been working on there, with help from Tony Fauci and NIAD.
It's possible that there was a bio-weapon in play and that it failed to detonate. This makes sense to me, and explains why the media was primed to spread hysteria when there was really nothing that unusual happening.
What other explanations can we offer for this utterly bizarre behaviour? You could argue that Morrison simply got carried away with the hysteria, but if that was the case why would he keep his actions secret from even his closest colleagues? That would not be a typical response if the actual threat was a genuine contagious respiratory illness which emerged spontaneously. On the other hand, if Morrison was apprised of secret intel that this was much more than another wild strain of coronavirus, but instead a biologically engineered pathogen designed to wipe out a huge swathe of humanity, then secrecy and covert actions such as the ones he took actually make sense.
Of course, it still doesn't make a great deal of sense in hindsight, because ultimately there was no mass death event. One day we may get to know the facts, but I'm not holding my breath.
It's clear in the video that Andrew Bolt cannot make head or tail of this story, but he is not looking in the direction I am pointing.
The current PM, Anthony Albanese is trying to take the moral highground and calls it an abuse of power, but my feeling is that these actions were prompted by forces which are way above the level of Australian party politics and have nothing to do with any personal ego-trip on the part of Morrison. My feeling is that a Labor PM would have done exactly the same thing, because the government was taking "guidance" (or, to call a spade a spade, "orders") from a higher source.
I would like to know who that higher source is and I believe I have a right to know what they were secretly telling the government.
Several months before the election there were various signs that Morrison/Liberals were not selected for the next term. Yes, I am suggesting that the elections are more or less meaningless because the result is to a degree determined in advance. That's not to say the votes don't actually take place and count but simply that the correct stories are specifically chosen to be used across the media, spoken about in specific ways, in order to encourage the large portion of the voters to vote a particular way. In this instance it was the stories of liberal politicians having issues surrounding patriarchy which triggered me to see who the next "winners" would be.
I like the way you view this thing, from a different perspective compared to how I would have ever thought of it, however I like to look at the rest of the world; with the bad publicity Trudeau has been receiving, poll numbers of Adern being the lowest ever, with the stepping down of Boris Johnson as well as various other leaders from varying countries. I don't think these simultaneous events are only coincidence. Some might say it's the result of the people backlashing against the policies over the last two years, however Australia and New Zealand are filled with brainwashed fools, many of whom still believe the policies were justified and some who think they should have been stricter.
I view this situation as one which has been made public to encourage/condition the public to accept that checks and balances of power can be taken advantage of with no repercussions, paving the way for future leaders to do the same thing (if Morrison/Cuomo/Newson/Adern/Trudeau didn't get sacked or prison time or even fined, the precedent is set for others to follow in the same path). As we've seen countless times, the lying bastard crony politicians get on stage and criticise others for doing exactly what they are doing or are about to do. So I would have no surprise if Albanese is going to do the very same thing but maybe in a different way (and when I say Albanese, I do mean the globalist handlers simply using Albanese/Morrison/etc. as a face).
Alternatively, the secondary thought I have (which is something I mentioned long ago) is this entire charade could be to enrage the public, through seeing what an absolute joke their political system in their country is. The end goal (solution, in the problem, reaction, solution setup) is for our country to be rescued by a global government that would "be more trustworthy" to keep the balance of power at bay and not let wild, power hungry politicians in any single nation grab onto too much power. At the very least though this story could be used yet again as a tool to encourage another vote to turn the country into a Republic, after all the attorney general was the one who swore Morrison in... it sounds like he's receiving some of the blame as well and since he's (allegedly) second to the Queen, it is technically his responsibility which has failed... Of course, this is based on a Commonwealth Parliament setup, but we don't have that (but the people don't realise we don't have that).